Give

Evolving Whiteness.  Silk, cotton, thread.

Shifting Boundaries, 2009. Silk, cotton, thread. 12" x 12"


We know there’s a will, but what’s the way?

Ever been part of a discussion with a group of grant-making colleagues about how your organization or network has, could, or “should” address race? Felt a little bit of anxiety or ambivalence about it? Many philanthropists, individuals and institutions alike, have made efforts to address race in our organizations and in our work, individually and together, in a variety of different ways. But somehow despite these efforts, implied or explicit, to advance racial equity, we have not figured out a way to galvanize this energy into a cohesive and consistent forward movement to strengthen all aspects of our work.

How would a robust racial equity analysis deepen the way we work on the issues we care about most? How does race impact outcomes on issues that don’t appear to have anything to do with race? This section of Project Linked Fate outlines some strategies for addressing some of the concerns and challenges philanthropists face when trying to apply a race analysis to their work. There are exercises to get your creative ideas flowing, and to help you start to imagine a clearer path into the future.

Aligning Values

This section includes materials used to design and catalyze multi-year initiatives inside funder networks to align values with actions. Many networks of progressive grant makers have had an implicit commitment to racial equity since their founding. However, most networks have found that maintaining that commitment, naming that commitment explicitly and translating commitment into practice is complex. More often than not, these networks have not developed an explicit, multi-year, multi-layered plan to translate emotional commitment into practice. The content here suggests a process to help organizations

a) acknowledge past successes,

b) reaffirm continued commitment,

c) consider strategies to address unmet challenges that implementation has presented,

d) strengthen commitment and deepen shared analysis, and

e) shift organizational culture to make an explicit commitment, encourage constructive discussion and purposefully take collective action to advance racial equity and racial justice.

Due to the continually evolving nature of race, it is important to seize opportunities to reflect upon and strengthen funder strategies to address racial and gender inequities that not only cause unnecessary suffering in targeted communities, but have been used to exacerbate and create intergroup tensions and undermine progressive change on a wide variety of issues. This process and curriculum proposes a process to establish shared commitment, a shared baseline of concepts, and to begin creating a collaborative forum for exploring the implications and application for networks and for both independent and collaborative grant making. It is our belief that persistent racial tensions ultimately prevent all of us from achieving a government that is inclusive and responsive to the needs of all people.

We assume that members approach this work with good will and a commitment to equity. It also assumes that the community — the members, staff and Board — is best situated to identify learning edges, challenges, sources of resistance, and levers to make the necessary changes to the network. This is not to diminish the role of experts, but to lift up the role of members in identifying what kinds of experts are needed when. This approach draws on the collective experience and insights of the funder community to identify potential next steps on the longer journey towards the ability of all communities to achieve their full potential.

The process here begins with one on one interviews by board, staff and members of other board, staff and members to build an organizational race history. Anonymously compiled, this history can be used to a) affirm commitment, b) recognize challenges, c) learn what has and hasn’t been effective in the past, d) understand likely sources of anxiety and resistance and e) constructive ways to address resistance. It also begins the process of identifying what strategies the network will need to employ in order to take the next steps and bring the full membership onto the same page.

After conducting the race history, hold a workshop or a series of workshops that to explore how three key levels at which race and gender play out—individual, institutional and structural—impact our work as individuals in philanthropy, in the philanthropic sector and as a network of grant makers. This serves to reveal the layers of work required while also demonstrating through practice that funder networks and the people in them, given commitment and support, have much of the expertise needed to identify interventions and outside resources necessary to take next steps.

Since the complexity of race cannot be adequately addressed in the course of one day, but rather takes a life time commitment to learn to observe it playing out right in front of us, these materials seek to give users tools that can help them recognize and address the processes that create racialized outcomes by learning more about a particular manifestation, problem solving with others, or collaborating to address similar concerns.

  • What compels you and what does race and gender have to do with it?
  • If you could deeply understand racial equity, what would become possible? If you never integrated racial equity into your work in philanthropy, what would then be true?
  • How has the absence of a fully integrated race and gender analysis impacted our ability to reach our shared goals?
  • What would it take for you/us to apply a racial and gender justice lens to all aspects of you/our philanthropy or take your/our application of that to the next level?
  • What support would you need to take this next step? What support could you give a colleague to help her/him take their next step?

How To Conduct A Race History

The purpose of developing an organizational or network race history through one on one conversations is not to persuade or convince, but rather to be curious. The discussion should seek to understand the range of experiences, gather information, note obstacles and learn about members’ relationship to the issue.  Try to gather information that would be useful for developing a strategy for maintaining forward momentum in the context of what is needed in terms of organization’s history and in terms of the national and global moment.

Goals of conducting interviews:

  • Acknowledge contributions of efforts that came before
  • Build support with leaders of past efforts
  • Articulate challenges the organization/network needs assistance with
  • Legitimate effort of current organizational sub-groupings
  • Model inquiry based conversation about race

Key categories of people to interview:

  • Members
  • Board members
  • Past leaders
  • Formal/recognized leaders
  • Informal leaders (people who have followers, people held in high regard)

Survey Questions:

  1. What have you learned about race as part of your experiences with the Organization/Network?
  2. For you, what are important milestones regarding race within the Organization/Network’s history
  3. What suggestions do you have for network members wishing to engage more with race?
  4. What suggestions do you have for the organization/network organizationally around being a more powerful force for racial justice?
  5. How would you like to be involved in addressing these issues?
  6. Who else would you recommend that we talk with about these issues? Members and beyond…
  7. Any other comments/reflections on what has and hasn’t worked well around these issues…

Philanthropy & Race Worksheets

If you really understood racial inequity, what would become possible? If you never incorporated racial equity into your grant-making, what would then be true?

Learning to incorporate a race analysis into your philanthropy takes work.  It takes work because we are carefully taught not to see and acknowledge the interlocking systems that create racialized outcomes.  Once one learns to recognize the symptoms of these systems, there isn’t a one size fits all band-aid for philanthropists.  The materials and worksheets that follow here provide baseline concepts and open-ended questions specifically directed towards philanthropists to support beginning that journey.

The concepts covered include the circle of human concern, racialization, structural inequity and structural opportunity, implicit racial bias, and dog whistle racism.

 

Click here to download a PDFGIVE presentation

Click here to download the worksheetsPhilanthropy Worksheets

Reflection

SeeingIn_Guinier

The flag is a powerful, potent symbol of the United States. The structure and colors of the flag communicate a narrative about this country; a seemingly fixed narrative about who is and isn’t included and on what terms. The very form of the flag masks the aggression, oppression, imperial aspirations and highly imperfect process of becoming the nation we are today.

While trying to hold in my mind the complexity of the racialized past and present of the United States, I struggle to imagine a different way to represent our nation. How can we begin to imagine ourselves as a nation in which all of the people who have built this country voluntarily or involuntarily, warily or with enthusiasm, in rebellion or in collaboration, are recognized as integral to this place that we call home? What visual image might start to represent this collection of people and make the space for our multiple narratives, so we are defined by our coming together, rather than by who we are and who we are not?

The persistent oversimplification and reduction of our national narrative by glossing over, simplifying and excluding the stories of entire communities, white, black and everything in between these two extremes of domination and subordination, undermines our ability to reach our fullest potential, as individuals, communities and as a country. We need to revisit and re-imagine our national narrative so that it includes the stories, the successes and failures, sadnesses and joys of all of our communities. One or two-dimensional representations of our country and our people obliterates the space for subtly, and denies that aspect of our nation that is its very source of our creativity and dynamism—namely our people.

Just as the structure of the flag needs to be challenged so that our national symbol includes all of our people, so too do the structures of our society. Through policy and practice, we need to recognize and address our different histories and how those histories impact our present lived realities. Most importantly, we need to ask ourselves how we shape policy and practice so that success is the rule rather than the exception in all communities. When crafting policy, how are we taking into account our different histories?

As a member of a number of progressive funder networks, predominantly white, I see many opportunities to support this change of policy and practice right at home. Some of these opportunities will succeed, some will fail, but all of these will offer openings to learn how to be better allies in the struggle for social justice and racial equity. At the Women Donors Network, we have started to wrestle with issues related to race, and our efforts, while sometimes frustrating, give me hope. Below I share some of seeds that we have planted and some of our future aspirations.

A significant number of our community members have been long time supporters of social justice, and racial justice in particular. However, despite numerous attempts to work on race by individual members in the context of the organization, the work and community of WDN has not yet been substantively transformed. Following hurricane Katrina, WDN members began to direct significant financial resources to recovery work in the Gulf region through a partnership with the 21st Century Foundation. This personal investment into racially charged situation catalyzed a small group of members to meet to try to explore how we as a community could more actively support racial justice.

We quickly started to realize that part of the challenge was that our creativity about how to be better allies had really been immobilized by our outward focused aspiration to have a racially diverse membership. We started to realize that first we needed to look inward to figure out how best to be allies rather than continue to look to others for answers. Namely, who holds wealth in this country and why? Would having a racially diverse membership “solve” race for WDN or would it just provide cover? And, importantly, are our actions aligned with our values and are there ways to live our values that might, in the long run, attract individual philanthropist of color?

A parallel line of questioning around community organizing started around the same time as our members struggled with being members of the political party that was, at that time, out of power. Individually we were clear that we had come together to find community, but equally clear was that we had only begun to self organize and exert our collective power in the larger political landscape.

A number of us started to come to realize that as individual philanthropists working in community, we are well situated to support significant steps towards racial equity if we are willing to do the hard work that we must do to align our values with our actions.

We are creating opportunities for our entire membership to learn about and understand structural racism. We are working to adopt practices within our own institution and in our relationships with other institutions that explicitly take into account the role of race and other forms of systematic oppression, such as class, gender and sexual orientation. That is, we are starting to figure out ways to hold ourselves accountable for understanding how history, policies and practices shape outcomes and to apply this understanding to all aspects of our work together. Even when we don’t think a structural analysis is needed, we are going to challenge ourselves to do one and figure out how it will inform our work.

We are planting the seeds to embrace racial complexity. Our understanding of race needs to be more finely gradated and nuanced to include knowledge of all racialized communities, and to understand how racialization continues to evolve over time. By lifting up the importance of considering race in our actions, collectively we are becoming increasingly aware that we can no longer claim to be working in a world defined by black and white, but rather need to recognize how race is used to limit options for Native Americans, African Americans, Asians, and Hispanics.

We are working on developing the confidence to talk about race constructively and are challenging ourselves to learn how. Increasing numbers of our members are realizing how negative racial stereotyping continues to be used, both implicitly and explicitly, to undermine public support of policies that we are passionate about and that could move us in the direction of racial equity and social justice more broadly.

We are at the beginning of this evolution, but are excited about the possibilities. Individual members have made commitments to these ideas, and we are looking for ways to share these practices with the membership at large and shape them into organizational best practices. For example, individual members have made commitments to supporting leadership of color and long term relationship building across race, class and gender lines for ourselves and for other social change stakeholders.

Other members have recognized that supporting leadership means a lot more than financial resources. By using our connections to individuals in power, we can help to lift up and amplify the voices of people who don’t have ready access. As individuals who give financial support to people in public office, we need to improve our tools for partnering across race and class to hold public officials accountable and for challenging them to transform policies and practices that continue to uphold racial disparities.

By shifting our framework for how we work to understand race from one that is purely interpersonal to one that is structural and systemic, the Women Donors Network has been able to deepen our internal conversation and understanding about race in a way that has opened up our creativity and has increased the possibilities for what we can imagine. We have begun to acknowledge the energy generated by racial anxiety and have started to redirect it into proactive, anti-racism next steps. We are learning as we walk, but we no longer need to accept that the current racial relationships are a given, unchangeable or even that things are as they seem. In Seeing the World in Black and White, looking closely reveals unexpected delights of color and texture, speaking to the unfulfilled potential of this nation. As we at the Women Donors Network look more closely at the potential that our organization holds to be a partner in the struggle for social justice, we see that we have unfinished work to do on race and that by doing that work, we are engaging in a process to reclaim our full humanity. The seeds have been planted and the roots are taking hold.